📄 Research Article
MindCopilot: Towards Formalizing and Evaluating Granular Human-LLM Co-Writing
MindCopilot introduces a formal framework for evaluating human-LLM co-writing that shifts from output-only metrics (BLEU, ROUGE) to interaction-aware evaluation. The paper models co-writing as a Human-in-the-Loop Markov Decision Process (HiL-MDP), where writing is a sequence of granular decisions: accept, edit, or reject each AI suggestion. The Co-Writing Fidelity Suite introduces two novel metrics — Hierarchical Acceptance Rate (quantifying acceptance across granularity levels) and Knowledge-aware Editing Distance (measuring cognitive effort of editing suggestions). Evaluated across 1,688 queries from 16 writing domains, with a 30-participant validation study.
For Writing Education, this represents a paradigm shift. Traditional automated writing evaluation focuses on final text quality, missing the process-level decisions that constitute real learning. The HiL-MDP framework aligns with process-oriented writing pedagogy — capturing where students accept, modify, or reject AI suggestions provides rich diagnostic information beyond what a final essay grade reveals. The work connects to Cyberscholar GenAI Writing Feedback and Structured LLM Feedback Programming by establishing that interaction structure (when/how suggestions appear) significantly affects user behavior. For AI Peer Feedback Systems, the acceptance/editing metrics offer a template for evaluating collaborative feedback workflows. Accepted to IJCAI 2026, this work bridges Human In The Loop AI theory with practical writing tool design, advancing LLM-based educational technology beyond static quality assessment toward dynamic interaction modeling.
Connected Concepts
Connected Articles
Citation
Youqing Fang, Yinhao Tang, Yanan Sun, Jiangning Liu, Ziyi Wang, Xun Zhao, Bin Liu, Weiming Zhang, Kuikun Liu, Wenwei Zhang, Kai Chen (2026). MindCopilot: Towards Formalizing and Evaluating Granular Human-LLM Co-Writing. arXiv:2605.23535. IJCAI 2026. - Humanlike AI Collaborative Writing — Anthropomorphic design choices amplify both benefits and costs of AI co-writing