🧠 AI Ed Wiki

Assessment validity — whether assessments measure what they claim to measure. AI in education raises fundamental validity questions: do AI-graded assessments assess student learning or AI prompting skill? Does AI use invalidate traditional assessment assumptions?

Validity challenges

  • Construct validity: When students use AI on assessments, does the score reflect student knowledge or AI capability? Performance vs. learning research addresses this directly.
  • Consequential validity: Do AI-mediated assessments have fair consequences? Language bias studies show that AI scoring can disadvantage non-native speakers.
  • Authentic assessment: Authentic Assessment and the AI Assessment Scale propose validity-preserving assessment redesigns.
  • Confidence and calibration: Confidence-aware systems improve validity by flagging uncertain assessments.
  • Redesign over detection

    The wiki argues that maintaining assessment validity requires redesigning assessments for AI-capable students, not detecting AI use. Beyond detection approaches and Assessment represent validity-forward thinking.

    Connections

    Assessment validity connects to Authentic Assessment, Automated Grading, Confidence Aware AI Assessment, Formative Assessment, Academic Integrity, and RCT (which relies on valid outcome measures).

    Connected Concepts

  • Authentic Assessment
  • Automated Grading
  • Confidence Aware AI Assessment
  • Formative Assessment
  • Academic Integrity
  • RCT
  • Bias Mitigation
  • Equity
  • AI Ed Evaluation
  • Educational Measurement
  • LLM
  • Connected Articles

  • Competency Based Education GenAI Production 2026
  • GenAI Performance Vs Learning
  • AI Scoring Language Bias Physics
  • AI Assessment Scale Reform
  • Beyond Detection Authentic Assessment AI 2025
  • Confidence Aware Student Drawing Assessment
  • Cong Confidence ASAG 2026