🧠 AI Ed Wiki

REC-CBM: Rubric-Aware Error-Correction Concept Bottleneck Models advances the Automated Grading frontier by solving a fundamental trust problem: even accurate AI graders are unusable if educators cannot verify their reasoning. Standard LLM-based graders operate as black boxes, while earlier Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) offer interpretability but fail at modeling rubric dimensions, ordinal score semantics, and noisy human annotations. REC-CBM introduces three innovations: (1) a rubric-aware concept encoder that learns concept-specific representations aligned with actual grading rubrics, (2) an ordinal pairwise calibration objective that preserves score ordering (e.g., 'poor' < 'fair' < 'good'), and (3) a latent error-correction module that denoises concept predictions while maintaining full interpretability. Experiments demonstrate consistent improvements in both grading accuracy and concept-level reasoning faithfulness over baselines. This work directly addresses Assessment Validity concerns raised in GenAI Assessment Governance and complements Automatic Short Answer Grading by adding the interpretability dimension. The rubric-aware design aligns with Formative Assessment needs and Scaffolding principles, and the error-correction approach resonates with work on Ground Truth Reliability AIED.

Connected Concepts

  • Automated Grading
  • LLM
  • Assessment Validity
  • Formative Assessment
  • Scaffolding
  • Connected Articles

  • GenAI Assessment Governance
  • Automatic Short Answer Grading
  • Ground Truth Reliability AIED
  • Citation

    Chengshuai Zhao, Fan Zhang, Kumar Satvik Chaudhary, Yiwen Li, Lo Pang-Yun Ting, Ying-Chih Chen, Huan Liu (2026). REC-CBM: Rubric-Aware Error-Correction Concept Bottleneck Models for Trustworthy Open-Ended Grading. arXiv:2605.27402. arXiv preprint.