Building AI Companions that Prioritise Learning over Performance

Created: 2026-05-09 | Tags: llmpersonalized-learningadaptive-learningmetacognitionstudent-experience
๐Ÿ“„ Full text: arXiv:2605.04816 ยท local

Definition

A design framework for LLM-powered educational agents that prioritize durable learning over short-term task performance. Introduced by Khosravi et al. (2026), AI learning companions are defined as adaptive, pedagogically informed agents integrated into learning environments โ€” distinct from both task-oriented LLMs and simple prompted tutors.

The Learning-Performance Paradox

LLMs demonstrably improve task outputs (writing quality, code correctness, analysis speed), but this can create a paradox: students who produce better work with AI may learn less. This mirrors and extends the llm-fallacy-misattribution phenomenon where users misattribute AI-assisted outputs to their own competence. The framework addresses the question posed by ai-learning-transfer: do AI-assisted gains persist when the tool is removed?

Three Foundations

1. Pedagogical Foundation โ€” grounded in learning science; how students learn with AI, not just from it 2. Adaptive Foundation โ€” AI learns about the student over time, connecting to llm-student-modeling-memory and longitudinal personalization 3. Responsible Design Foundation โ€” transparency, accountability, inclusivity, security; aligns with ai-tutor-safety-harms harm taxonomy

Case Studies

Validated across five diverse educational contexts, levels, and tool designs, revealing both promise and current limitations. The framework calls for a deliberate shift from task-optimized LLMs toward companions that foster durable understanding, metacognitive growth, and learner agency โ€” connecting directly to self-regulated-learning and metacognition.

Related Pages