Dongming Mei, Katherine Moore, Ben Sayler (2026) โ Framework for integrating AI literacy with materials science education.
๐ Full text (arXiv)
Key Findings
This paper presents a workflow-aligned framework for preparing students to use AI in materials discovery. The authors argue that in materials science, the limiting factor is no longer only algorithmic capability but human-AI collaboration competence. Students need to develop scientific judgment about when to trust AI predictions and how to integrate them into research workflows.^[raw/papers/2605.09624.md]
The framework connects AI literacy to equity and scientific judgment, emphasizing that students from under-resourced backgrounds may lack exposure to AI-powered research workflows. This intersects with broader equity-in-ai-education and stem-education concerns.^[raw/papers/2605.09624.md]
Connections to AIED
The materials discovery context offers a model for how AI literacy should be taught across STEM disciplines: not as abstract knowledge, but as embedded workflow competence. This connects to agentic-workflows-education where students learn to use AI tools as part of authentic research practice rather than as separate subjects.^[raw/papers/2605.09624.md]
The framework also touches on metacognition โ students need to develop judgment about AI outputs, which requires meta-awareness of their own reasoning processes when evaluating AI-generated predictions.
Related Pages
- ai-literacy โ AI literacy as embedded workflow competence, not abstract knowledge
- equity-in-ai-education โ Under-resourced students lack exposure to AI-powered research workflows
- stem-education โ Materials science as a domain for AI integration in STEM curricula
- metacognition โ Developing judgment about AI outputs requires metacognitive awareness
- agentic-workflows-education โ AI tools as part of authentic research practice
Citation
APA: Mei, D., Moore, K., & Sayler, B. (2026). Preparing students for AI-powered materials discovery: A workflow-aligned framework for AI literacy, equity, and scientific judgment. arXiv:2605.09624.