Beyond Perspectives: A Trio-Ethnography of Interpretation Evolution in LLM-Supported Programming Education

Created: 2026-07-27 | Tags: generative-aistem-educationteacher-rolestudent-experiencehigher-ed

Ren, McDowell & Zhou (2026) โ€” arXiv preprint (cs.HC, cs.AI).

๐Ÿ“„ Full text (arXiv)

This experience report introduces trio-ethnography โ€” structured dialogue between two computing educators with differing teaching philosophies and one undergraduate CS student โ€” as a method for surfacing how educators' interpretations of students' AI use evolve. The central finding is that much AI-supported learning is invisible from the classroom: across three conversations, the student's lived-experience narratives revealed learning processes that neither educator could infer from observable behavior, prompting both to revise assumptions about AI use, assessment design, and transparency in cs-education.

The paper complicates the dominant framing of student-ai-interaction research, which typically measures behavior (prompt logs, usage frequency) rather than interpretation. Educators here initially read student AI use through the lens of over-reliance risk, but dialogue revealed more nuanced self-regulation and scaffolding-seeking than surveillance-style observation suggested. This aligns with broader calls for ai-literacy frameworks that treat students as reflective agents rather than compliance subjects.

Methodologically, trio-ethnography offers a low-cost reflective instrument for faculty development: rather than instrumenting classrooms with analytics, it uses sustained cross-perspective conversation to update pedagogical beliefs. As an experience report with n=3 it makes no generalizability claims, but it provides a replicable protocol for departments adapting programming instruction in the generative-AI era.

Related Pages

Citation

APA: Ren, McDowell & Zhou (2026). Beyond Perspectives: A Trio-Ethnography of Interpretation Evolution in LLM-Supported Programming Education. arXiv:2607.22463. arXiv preprint.