Agentic Literacy Debt: A Structural Problem the AI Literacy Field Has Not Yet Named

Created: 2026-05-28 | Tags: agentic-aiai-literacyequitygenerative-aihigher-edk-12policy-maker

Nama et al. (2026) โ€” Independent researcher. AI & Ethics.

๐Ÿ“„ Full text (arXiv)

Agentic Literacy Debt names a critical gap in the ai-literacy landscape that has become urgent with the rise of autonomous AI agents. Existing AI literacy frameworks assume humans evaluate AI outputs and then decide โ€” they were built for a world of tools, not agents. But modern AI agents plan, decide, and act without step-by-step human approval, creating a structural deficit when deployed without corresponding literacy infrastructure. The debt compounds through three reinforcing channels: (1) normalization of opaque delegation, (2) multi-agent ecosystem complexity, and (3) institutional path dependence. Critically, the debt is incurred by deploying organizations but paid by users, patients, and citizens โ€” a responsibility asymmetry that parallels arguments in genai-minoritized-knowledges-disability about who bears the costs of AI deployment. The paper reframes ai-literacy from an evaluative competency ("can you spot AI errors?") to a governance capability ("do you understand what you've delegated, and can you contest it?"). This connects to digital-literacy-illusion findings that students overestimate their AI readiness, and to over-reliance research showing that delegation without understanding produces dependency. Published in AI & Ethics, this paper has immediate implications for k-12 and higher-ed AI literacy curricula, suggesting they must add agentic delegation concepts alongside traditional evaluation skills.

Related Pages

Citation

APA: Rohith Nama (2026). Agentic Literacy Debt: A Structural Problem the AI Literacy Field Has Not Yet Named. arXiv:2605.27396. AI & Ethics.