Four Types of LLM Reliance and Their Predictors Among Undergraduate Writers: A Mixed-Methods Study at a Minority-Serving R1 University

Created: 2026-06-30 | Tags: ai-literacyhigher-edover-reliancestudent-experiencewriting-education

Hossain (2026) โ€” cs.CY / cs.AI / cs.HC ๐Ÿ“„ Full text (arXiv)

Hossain (2026) develops a typology of LLM reliance among undergraduate writers at a minority-serving R1 institution, identifying four distinct profiles: strategic scaffolders who use AI for idea generation and structure, critical editors who revise AI output substantially, passive acceptors who submit AI-generated text with minimal changes, and uncritical delegators who offload entire assignments. The mixed-methods design combines survey data with qualitative interviews, revealing that self-efficacy and prior academic preparation are the strongest predictors of the reliance type. The over-reliance types (passive acceptors and uncritical delegators) were disproportionately represented among students with lower writing self-efficacy, raising equity concerns. The findings directly inform ai-literacy curriculum design by identifying which student populations need targeted support. The study contributes to writing-education research by mapping how student-experience of AI writing tools varies across a diverse student body, challenging one-size-fits-all AI policies in higher-ed.

Related Pages

Citation

APA: Shahin Hossain (2026). Four Types of LLM Reliance and Their Predictors Among Undergraduate Writers: A Mixed-Methods Study at a Minority-Serving R1 University. arXiv:2606.28749. cs.CY / cs.AI / cs.HC.