Designing Needs- and Attention-Aware AI Learning Tools for Engineering Education: Insights from Psychological Outcomes

Created: 2026-07-30 | Tags: higher-edstem-educationstudent-experienceaffective-computingpersonalized-learningscaffolding

Shao et al. (2026) โ€” Under review.

๐Ÿ“„ Full text (arXiv)

Survey of 206 engineering students: AI chatbots provide greatest perceived benefit as relief from competence frustration, smaller benefits for autonomy, weakest for relatedness. Baseline motivational states matter more than demographics; inattention moderates how baseline competence and autonomy relate to perceived AI benefits. Offers design principles for engineering-specific AI learning tools.

Relevance to AI in Education: This paper contributes to the understanding of llm-assessment, personalized-learning, and student-experience. The findings have implications for adaptive-learning systems, formative-assessment design, and the broader edtech-platform landscape. Future work should explore how these results generalize across stem-education and higher-ed contexts.

This research connects to the growing body of work on ai-literacy and teacher-role, highlighting both the promise and limitations of AI tools in educational settings.

Related Pages

Citation

APA: Kevin Zhongyang Shao, Denise Wilson, Yale Quan, Sep Makhsous (2026). Designing Needs- and Attention-Aware AI Learning Tools for Engineering Education: Insights from Psychological Outcomes. arXiv:2607.26338. Under review.