Concept
Situated Learning
Situated Learning — the theory, rooted in the early-1990s work of Lave and Wenger (1991), that learning is not an isolated, decontextualized act but occurs through participation in authentic activities, contexts, and cultures. Knowledge is co-constructed by learners and peers within communities of practice, and novices learn through legitimate peripheral participation — absorbing the culture, language, and practices of expert members as they move from the periphery to the center of a community. Emphasis falls on learning by doing in real-world situations, where Assessment emerges from the task itself rather than being separated from it.
Questions to Consider
- Think of something you genuinely know how to do well — a skill, a trade, a craft. Did you learn it mostly from abstract instruction or from participating in a real community that did that thing? What does that suggest about where knowledge actually lives?
- Lave and Wenger describe novices learning through 'legitimate peripheral participation' — starting at the edge of a community of practice and moving inward. Where have you watched (or been) such a newcomer, and what let them move from the periphery to the center?
- If knowledge is 'situated' in authentic contexts, what does that imply for the traditional classroom, which deliberately separates learning from real-world situations — and for AI tools designed to deliver decontextualized content?
- The page treats situated learning as a design lens for AI. How might an adaptive system or simulation ground learning in authentic practice rather than pulling it out of context?
- What obstacles does the research say stand in the way of situating AI-driven learning in real contexts, and which of those have you seen in your own institution?
Introduction
Situated learning is one of the activity-and-context theories within the knowledge base's Learning Theories strand. It takes up Vygotskian themes of social construction but adds a strong emphasis on the intimate integration of "doing" and "learning" and on the importance of communities of practice. As an educational stance it confronts traditional, standardized schooling by foregrounding the learner's sociocultural context as a key element for acquiring skills and appropriating knowledge relevant to their reality.
In the AI-in-education literature, situated learning matters because it provides a design lens for AI: adaptive systems, intelligent tutoring in authentic scenarios, and immersive simulations can ground AI-driven education in real-world contexts, while situated learning in turn offers AI a meaningful anchor in authentic practice and complexity. The two are widely treated as complementary, with human guidance remaining essential for ethical grounding.
Situated learning as a design lens for AI
The knowledge base's research treats situated learning not merely as an abstract theory but as a concrete design and evaluation framework for AI in education:
- Opportunities and obstacles. A PRISMA systematic review of 60 articles (three decades) finds that AI can augment situated learning — through adaptive systems tailored to students' evolving needs, intelligent tutoring situated in authentic scenarios, automation of administrative tasks, and data-driven teacher support — while the main obstacles are the traditional school's one-way passive learning, an over-emphasis on predefined outcomes, and teachers' limited contextual knowledge. Human guidance remains essential for ethical grounding.(Reshaping education in the era of artificial intelligence: insights from Situated Learning related literature)
- AI as a catalyst connecting education to reality. AI can act as a catalyst for situated learning by connecting education with reality and authentic contexts, enabling learning grounded in real-world scenarios.(Connecting Education with Reality: AI as a Catalyst for Situated Learning)
- Mediational artifacts in authentic inquiry. In science learning, AI tools (virtual labs, simulations, intelligent tutoring) function as "mediational artifacts" that extend situated learning by enabling digital communities of practice and boundary-crossing between school, real-world, and interdisciplinary contexts — transforming students from "knowledge learners" into "scientific practitioners."(Artificial Intelligence in Science Learning within the Framework of Situated Learning Theory: A Qualitative Investigation of Teachers' Perspectives)
- Situated curriculum devices. AI literacy can be developed through Episodes of Situated Learning — active teaching instruments (anticipate, produce, reflect) that build AI competencies through real-world Problem Solving rather than abstract instruction.(Towards AI literacy: A proposal of a framework based on the Episodes of Situated Learning)
- Situated evaluation in design-based learning. Yaşar et al. (2026) grounded their study in situated-learning theory and iterative design Pedagogies and Teaching Strategies, evaluating 80 student design posters across instructor, peer-reviewer, and grant-reviewer roles. Role-aware prompting produced qualitatively different evaluative feedback — instructors encouraging and process-oriented, peers supportive and conversational, grant reviewers formal and outcomes-oriented — differences that were epistemic, not merely stylistic, foregrounding different aspects of design practice. This shows how situated, role-specific evaluation can be emulated by an LLM when scaffolded with a semantically precise rubric, and how assessment in design-based learning emerges from the authentic task and its roles rather than being separated from them.
- Situated AI ethics. Ethical reasoning about AI is itself best treated as situated — grounded in cultural-historical and ecological context rather than abstract principles.(Situated AI ethics: a cultural-historical and ecological framework for education)
Situated learning connects closely to Embodied Learning (both stress the grounding of cognition in context and action), Distributed Cognition (learning distributed across people, tools, and contexts), Experiential Learning, and Constructivism theory. In AI education it grounds the critique of decontextualized, disembodied learning: AI design that keeps learners anchored in authentic practice preserves the situatedness that durable learning requires.
Connected Concepts
- Learner Identity — evolving disciplinary, professional, creative, and academic learner identities
- Learning Theories
- Constructivism
- Experiential Learning
- Embodied Learning
- Distributed Cognition
- Collaborative Learning
- Adaptive Learning
- Personalized Learning
- Teaching
- Learning Design
- AI in Education
- Virtual and Augmented Reality — immersive environments as a route to authentic context
Connected Articles
- Reshaping education in the era of artificial intelligence: insights from Situated Learning related literature — PRISMA systematic review of situated learning and AI in education (primary reference for this page)
- Generative AI technologies and educational outcomes: a comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and AI-driven approaches
- Artificial Intelligence in Science Learning within the Framework of Situated Learning Theory: A Qualitative Investigation of Teachers' Perspectives
- Situated AI ethics: a cultural-historical and ecological framework for education
- Connecting Education with Reality: AI as a Catalyst for Situated Learning
- Towards AI literacy: A proposal of a framework based on the Episodes of Situated Learning
- From evaluation to emulation: LLMs as agents of iterative pedagogical design — LLMs as agents of iterative pedagogical design